Surely the US paras you mentioned would have to take the test if they were breaking cover to assault a tank. This is exactly why the rule is there. I don't
So judging from the responses in the previous posts (thanks kindly) ... if unsupported by inf, would say a 251 loaded with pz gr have to do the same since you
I suppose it depends on what is trying to be modeled by the rules. Armor is loathe to advance into situations where they may be ambushed by infantry with such
Marc, we play this a bit different locally based on a series of e-mails with Colin Rumford. Here is the wording from our own local interpretations: (4.1) When
John, 1. True a 251 mounting a gun is treated as a self propelled gun i.e. AFV in RF likewise a US half track with a gun mounted ... that ... support. 2. We