I tried searching the Net and have found no place selling these rules in the USA and the publishers site is down. Any suggestions would be appreciated. jim...
www.onmilitarymatters.com ... From: jim To: Might-of-Arms@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 6:17 PM Subject: [MOA] buying the rules I tried searching...
The publisher's (same as author's) site has not ever been down (barring any ISP temporary problems), although its URL changed several years ago. Here it is...
Bob, The condition to test morale when in melee with enemy fierce troops seems like it could be a bit more tightly worded. Taken literally from the panel on...
... (barring ... years ago. ... Speaking of which, do any game stores actually carry MOA? Given all the Kinko's production jobs and stapled homebrews they try...
I'd probably just classify these guys as a mixed archer formation... only 4 of the 16 ranks were supposed to be pike armed, and one of those was in the rear....
... Well, if they are disregarded they won't protect/do ANYTHING in MoA. And I don't think four ranks of pike should be written off so easily... And, I am of...
... SNIP Thanks for the comments. I see your points. This will require some thought for efficient wording. If you want to have a go at it, feel free. To...
The main game store that carries MOA is Adventurer's Guild in Riverside, CA. I don't know whether On Military Matters has a store but they do mail order. About...
... What, and relinquish my right to bitch? Are you trying to spoil my fun? :) ... This might be a good thing to add to the FAQ. (There are a few more that...
... Which is funny, because I hear a lot of people in that area play a version of MOA with so many fundamental changes they might as well have written a whole...
... Three ranks, actually. And I'm confused why you think they don't do "ANYTHING" since they are perfectly capable of fighting just as well as any other...
... SNIP I agree. If I had it to do over, Persians would be subheavy and probably C and D class maybe with options for upgrading a couple of units. Since the...
fabius_maximus@... wrote: SNIP ... SNIP ... I don't follow you here. Could you point to the specific rules statements that support this? Without spending...
Hi Bob: Unless I missed something in your previous post, your clarification was that units CHARGED and contacted by fierce need to test. The implication is...
... I still fail to see how we can (reasonably) right off 3-4 ranks of men carrying 15' long pikes when we consider this formation. Especially when we are...
... Oops!!! I should have said "...the intent was that in each new melee, a unit that is charged by fierce troops OR CHARGES FIERCE TROOPS would check once. If...
... Yes, but---- The "Charge & Charge Response Checks" table leads off with "Dicing is not required (disregard other circumstances) for: o Formed troops to...
... OOPS! Disregard my previous email where I got confused on what the issue is. It's not about fierce troops. I see your point. You way you have been playing...
... Ah. Well, that's consistant with your definition of contact, anyway. (Though I'm going to feel really weird in situations where my cavalry charges a...
... camelry ... Yeah, the implication that dedicated skirmishers had to test morale to skirmish struck me as odd. A case where I can see what the rules mean,...
Here are some ideas on how MOA can simulate certain "tweener" troop types using existing mechanisms. Some are serious, some a bit silly. I came up with this...
I am organizing some historic MoA battles in Northern Virginia, Sundays at 1 pm. We are starting this sunday (23rd) with Leuctra, and next up will be the...
Trying to get a game Sunday to test my Experimental Phalanx out. Should be VS Mongols, and if so, they should provide a decent test for the formation. I have...
A skirmish unit is engaged, either with an elephant or another skirmish unit. On the next turn, the opponent charges the skirmishers with a formed infantry...
