Also being at the meeting, I interpreted Chris and Ian's response as
an attempt to categorise Greyhawk in the 'potential' basket,
alongside Darksun, Ravenloft etc.

Remember that the vast majority of people in attendance had just
finished playing in Greyhawk ten minutes beforehand, so it was
somewhat top of mind. :)

Also, given the hysteria that is generated from any off-hand remarks
by a WotC staff member (see ENWorld, the WotC boards), I can't blame
anyone for refusing to make defintive statements on subjects that are
not set in stone. I've seen a thread where the arguments essentially
boiled down to interpreting where a comma would be placed from a
spoken statement! (thus changing its meaning)


Joe



--- In Living_Greyhawk@yahoogroups.com, "Cory" <teraknor@...> wrote:
>
> I was at that meeting. Someone asked about Greyhawk and the answer
> was "all things may be looked at, but not for a while". So don't be
> expecting anyting for a good number of years. They stated
Ravenloft,
> Darksun and Spelljammer. There was not talk of Greyhawk until it
was
> asked (not by me!) and the answer was very evasive and very non-
> commital.
>
> Cory Fliegel
> Zeif Triad
> Owner "Myth Games"
>
>
> --- In Living_Greyhawk@yahoogroups.com, Darrell Impey <darrell@>
> wrote:
> >
> > The following news was released at the GAMA Trade Show, and
reported
> on
> > EN World:
> >
> > "Forgotten Realms 4e is three books, period, done, end of line:
> > Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide, Player’s Guide to FR, and
DM’s
> > Guide to FR. All settings will be done like that, one per year,
until
> > they run out of settings. They mentioned Greyhawk, Ravenloft,
Dark
> Sun,
> > and Spelljammer as settings on their list! Eberron, of course, is
the
> > ‘09 setting release (same three books), but it will also get
DDI
> > updates starting in June."
> > --
> > Darrell
> >
>