Welcome to the Legends of the Shining Jewel Mailing List. This list is for discussion of the UCC's LSJ Procampur campaign, a continuing role playing campaign...
LSJ-Campaign@yahoogro...
Aug 1, 2003 9:55 am
1356
As many of you have probably heard by now, we did well at Gencon. We ran two tables of each event per slot, three tables for the premiere of "Author, ...
... No. We are completely independent from the RPGA or Organized Play organizations. Which, in itself, unties our hands to do whatever that needs to be done...
In a message dated 8/1/03 10:15:04 PM Eastern Daylight Time, ... Not in the least. We were told by Ryan Dancey that he no longer wanted Procampur to be part...
... website!)-------------- Greetings folks! Welcome to the Legends of the Shining Jewel's first (of many) Campaign Developmental Contests! One of the things...
... website!)-------------- The Legends of the Shining Jewel Campaign Staff would like to present the LSJ Player Rewards Program. Players will have the...
Hey, LSJ staff folk, I saw several of you wearing very nice-looking LSJ baseball caps at GenCon. I don't suppose there's any way that avid LSJ players could ...
I have mine. What? You can't see it. Good!!! MSW ... From: "Mike Mistele" <MJMistele@...> To: <LSJ-Campaign@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, 07 August...
... Well, I was finishing up with art updates for the site, but ... Help support the Legends of the Shining Jewel and the UCC! We have a new Cafepress Shop!...
POLL OF THE WEEK 8/12 When we convert to 3.5, should we adopt the new weapon size rules (a version of every weapon for each character size) or stick with the...
... Nope. A longsword in 3.5, for instance, is the standard 1d8 damage for a medium sized user, but is 1d6 if sized for a small user. I wanted to get folks...
Of course in the 3.0 version you could always make smaller versions of weapons anyway... a long sword for a halfling was always a short sword... In the 3.5...
I'm in favor of keeping it, but only because I don't think we should go mucking with the core rules overmuch as RRB did. Having said that, the rules are really...
Well... if they are tiny ranseaurs... then by the rules, a medium person trying to wield them would suffer a -4 penalty (-2 cumulative penalty for each size...
i feel a compromise is in order, specificly use the new mechanics as necessary, but keep the names in common usage as the 3.0... most IC people wouldnt know...
... I disagree. While it might wwork in a home campaign, we need to have as few "house rules" as possible. And if we do indeed go to 3.5, we can't switch ...
Here is something I would like to see... A timeline that covers the 5 or so years that Procampur was part of the LC campaign... I know that there was a war or...
... True, but...apparently, they decided that there was going to be a significant number of players who agree that this new rule is goofy, because there's a...
... one would *HOPE* that while still having reach - that reach would shrink with the weapon size - thus your shrimp forks may only have 12" of reach... handy...
Hello Folks, Just so you know, Dan Cooper has moved from City Development Coordinator to Metagaming Coordinator Dan Cooper LSJ Metagaming Coordinator...
... It seems to me that the big question with this is related to treasure distribution in a disperse campaign where DMs can't tailor loot to the characters who...
... That will be one of the main points that will come up. Depending on the size of the baddies they will have appropriate sized weapons, most of the time. And...
