Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
LGDMs · Living Greyhawk DM's
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 9554 - 9583 of 13452   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
9554
Welcome to LGDMs! RULES: 1. Treat each other with respect! 2. DO NOT POST CONVENTION ADVERTISEMENTS OR RECRUIT DM'S HERE. Use regional lists for convention...
LGDMs@yahoogroups.com
Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
1:56 am
9555
Apparently the LGCS v5.0 draft is up on WotC site and discussion/feedback will be on the WotC boards instead of the Yahoo group as in previous times. Here's...
Albert Nakano
bertman4
Offline Send Email
Feb 2, 2006
6:19 pm
9556
From the LG News group .... What Ho All, The information below refers to the "Honoury Blader" AR favour possibly won in COR4-14 Sympathy of the Baatezu. It has...
Warren Wright
viceregal_au
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
5:30 am
9557
Don't you guys think the latter half of this is overreacting more than a small amount? Russ ... From: "Warren Wright" <viceregal@...> To:...
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
5:44 am
9558
It is still one step down from the full on cleric of kelannen - the Blader can use a non-sword weapon if needed for a specific occasion (eg take out the...
Warren Wright
viceregal_au
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
5:56 am
9559
... Not at all. You want to gain the benefits of the Lord of Swords sect, you tow the party line and use a sword whenever possible. You don't want to tow the...
Stephen Mumford
stevemnd
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
7:24 am
9560
Well, conditions like that needed to be on the initial AR, or at least in the adventure. I can see the smiting thing, since it's dishonest to try and use a...
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
7:47 am
9561
This is a role-playing game and as such I think it is obvious what the order was about. Membership was optional, you had to choose to convert to the Sword Sect...
Sandy Douglas
bardach2002
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
11:21 am
9562
... Smiting with something other than a sword shouldn't be allowed. I do think that if a player did choose to normally use something other than a sword as his...
Jon Naughton
jonnaughton
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
11:42 am
9563
From the original message . ... kind of melee weapon in >preference to a sword he will be excommunicated from the sect. I don't see the words immediate or...
Warren Wright
viceregal_au
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
12:09 pm
9564
I have not been able to recieve a ruling on this matter from the wizards community boards and thus hope to recieve one here. I hope the this warrants attention...
rufus6543
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
4:37 pm
9565
It is my opinion (and there are others who disagree) that Chain Spell only works on spells with a "Target" entry. Rays lack such an entry so I would rule that...
timlagor
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
5:27 pm
9566
Ranged touch spells aren't chainable anyway, so this was never a valid combo. It's worth remembering that _many_ people out there have "combos" that don't...
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
5:41 pm
9567
Chain feat only requires that a spell has a range greater than touch and ranged touch is greater than touch. Second, all touch spells have a target entry, the...
gibson2004@...
rufus6543
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
5:56 pm
9568
No, it requires that it affects a single target. Spells that affect targets have to have a Targets entry, and rays and such are not targeted, they are "effect"...
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
6:07 pm
9569
I guess the question is: Does reach change a spell to a ray? In which case all ray entries I have found do not have a target entry and thus not chainable...
gibson2004@...
rufus6543
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
6:07 pm
9570
... targets ... they are ... Plus, if chain spell works almost s well, why have a 'split ray' metamagic feat? Chain does not work on rays (or any other...
Baris
writ_on_water
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
7:26 pm
9571
I see what you are saying with the target/ray/effect definition and from that stand point touch spells can not be chained. So, with this interpretation, there...
gibson2004@...
rufus6543
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
8:00 pm
9572
... magic,/greater, doom, ... shield other, speak ... That is correct. I mean, i haven't checked the cleric spells, but i have checked the wizard spells, and...
Baris
writ_on_water
Offline Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
8:36 pm
9573
Ray or not, find a ranged touch spell in the book with a Target or Targets entry, rather than an Effects entry. That adds the orb spells and such into the mix....
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 4, 2006
9:51 pm
9574
Interesting. I have seen a Chained Silence spell used in a LG Core module. Silence does not have a target entry, although it kind of does in the Area...
Albert Nakano
bertman4
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
1:24 am
9575
We have a player that needs to find someone to cast the spell mark of justice. There is a 12th level cleric that the module states is available for...
Cody Knotts
cody4us
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
1:45 am
9576
If anyone happens to have a copy of Dark Deceit on the Bright Sands and can email it to me, it would be most appreciated - scheduled to run it, and was unable...
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
4:01 am
9577
... spell). It is a smaller bump (+2 instead of +3) and it does full damage on the extra ray (instead of half). Mind you, you can't chain rays as they are...
James
jmaissen
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
4:28 am
9578
... into a ... You mean kinda like the way Confusion does? I understand your point, but it would be stronger if you could argue that a ranged touch could not...
James
jmaissen
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
4:50 am
9579
... From: "James" <jmaissen@...> To: <LGDMs@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 8:42 PM Subject: [LGDMs] Re: Clarrification needed for the...
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
4:59 am
9580
In error, much like the author who gave a monster iterative natural attacks. ... Russ ... From: "Albert Nakano" <bertman4@...> To:...
Russ Taylor
rtcmc
Online Now Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
5:00 am
9581
... on page ... a target, ... not "Targets". As it ... due to ... touch the ... continue ... spell, ... contradictory wording ... Targets say ... figuring ... ...
James
jmaissen
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
2:36 pm
9582
Is it possible for someone with a +4 BAB to achieve a pin in a grapple? By my understanding of the rules it is not as you have to maintain your grapple each...
yetro99
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
6:41 pm
9583
There is no check to maintain the grapple -the onus is on the other guy to escape (using their actions and not yours) with an opposed Grapple check (or their...
timlagor
Offline Send Email
Feb 5, 2006
7:00 pm
Messages 9554 - 9583 of 13452   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help