According to the rules, he'll get to attack you again before you can do anything anyways. The system would reward you if you declared full defense any time you went to the back of the line. After every action you make, or every time you get hit, you'd go to the back anyway, so you could declare full defense just then until it's your turn again. Here's how I understand it:
Suppose person A attacks person B and misses, then A goes to the back of the line and B can go next. A immediately declares Full Defense. Then B takes his swing, misses (or hits, it doesn't matter), and goes to the back of the line, where he declares Full Defense too. Neither one takes any penalty whatsoever for declaring full defense, and they have it on all the time until their next turn comes.
On Jan 11, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Bill Hamilton wrote:
If you are attacked and declare full defense, you go to the back of the "line" whether you're hit or not. If you are attacked and _don't_ delcare full defense, you only lose your place in line if you get hit. Thus, if you aren't hit, you will probably get to do something. If you always use full defense you're always behind the guy who attacked you, meaning he gets to attack you again before you can do anything.
-Bill Hamilton
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:47 AM, D B <softflowingwaters@gmail.com> wrote: > > And now for my question: > What I don't understand is, why wouldn't every single character > declare Full Defense any time after they've attacked or been hit by an > attack? In both these cases they would be last in line to act > anyways, and so Full Defense would come to them basically for free > every time.
Hello - I've been puzzling over how to handle armor in a FATE 3.0ish game. I've thumbed through the message archives, but haven't really liked what I've seen: ...
I do something similar to this. The armor reduces stress of successful hit 1, 2, or 3 depending on grade. Whenever you wear armor you have an "Armored" special...
Starblazer has three grades of shields and armour that reduce incoming stress by 1, 2 and 3 respectively, but also reduce movement related skills by the same...
... Yeah, I like Starblazer's take for Space Opera, but my campaign is Ancient Fantasy. Shields are brass capped wood and armor damage is just a rent or dent....
I really like this system - especially for a fantasy game where combat- or gear-related crunch may be more desirable. I particularly like the various stunts...
... realm ... I like this idea, too, for when we want a more "crunchy" campaign. When you mentioned "magic items" I imagined "Mythril chain" as Chain armor...
I've been putting off replying to this in the hopes that I could avoid leaping to the defense of the whole Armor as Skill idea -- alas, I am weak... Let me...
First off, I'd like to thank everyone who's responded, and particularly those who've encouraged. It seems I may be on to something here, so I'll work on it...
... Issue here: the penalty should be for all non-defensive uses of Athletics. Being the primary defensive skill of combat, a penalty to Athletics hurts the...
I know the topic of Advantage-based combat hasn't been discussed for a couple months now, but I was just reading about it on the website and was struck with a...
If you are attacked and declare full defense, you go to the back of the "line" whether you're hit or not. If you are attacked and _don't_ delcare full...
According to the rules, he'll get to attack you again before you can do anything anyways. The system would reward you if you declared full defense any time...
... full ... action ... back ... goes ... Neither ... they ... This is a very good point. In my head I had always imagined someone taking the Full Defense...
... Ahh, I see what you mean. It helps if I actually read the rules instead of assuming I remember them correctly. Here's how I would change it to make more...
Bill, I understand now what your solution is. I think it works great if one is using Full Defense as a mechanism to not die whenever you get attacked....