Well, the rules define what "coexistance" means, and that definition is
obviously different form the English definition of the word, and it's
safe to say that as the faction rules take precedence over the general
rules, the general rules take precedence over the dictionary.com rules :)


Sitko wrote:
> This brings up a logic problem:
>
> The definition of coexist on dictionary.com is: 1. to exist together
> or at the same time. 2. to exist separately or independently but
> peaceably, often while remaining rivals or adversaries: Although
> their ideologies differ greatly, the two great powers must coexist.
> Both definitions reference the fact that the items that are
> coexisting are doing so together, or to exist independently but
> peacefully. If the BGs are coexisting in a city with other units
> there, and those other units leave the stronghold, who would the BGs
> be coexisting with when they were alone? No one. So, their
> coexistence status COULD be changed. Imho, the BGs can't coexist by
> themselves...there needs to be at least one other party for the BGs
> to be able to coexist.
>
> But, I digress. The way I've played it was that if the BGs are left
> alone in a city, where they were coexisting, and a third party moved
> into that city, then they could choose at that time to coexist or
> not, as the persons they had announced they were coexisting with have
> left. And as always, they have no choice but to coexist if they
> share a territory with their ally.
>
> :)
>
>