Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
DBMMlist
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 45192 - 45221 of 105879   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
45192
There was a programme about Islamic art on television a while ago. Apparently the Shi'ites over history periodically swing from total rejection of the use of...
Peter Kershaw
tinkerer_99
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
7:03 am
45193
If you combine regular and irregular troops within your 4-10 elements of your baggage command, what dice do you throw? Does it count as another regular command...
prussianhussaruk
prussianhuss...
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
7:23 am
45194
... The baggage command only counts as regular if ALL of the elements in it are regular....
Mike Campbell
mikekiwi2001
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
7:42 am
45195
... Thank you Peter. I re-read the pint and saw what you said. I was confused by the first point about the weather score, and the "wether" found later helped...
Jean-Pierre Riviere
meddurenos
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
7:43 am
45196
If I read correctly, in fact, in DBMM 100 the invader has the full choice of the side he elects as his base edge. Am I correct? I have not got any ansewer in...
Jean-Pierre Riviere
meddurenos
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
7:46 am
45197
... DR: Many apologies David, I had forgotten you had a page long moan about rebasing figures with reference to clay effigies of Phil and large pins. It was...
dave.ruddock@...
dave.ruddock
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
7:59 am
45198
Classification : SEC=PERSONAL I don't think this can happen. All of the baggage in an army must be either regular or irregular. And allies can't put their...
Barrett, Peter
Peter.Barrett@...
Send Email
May 1, 2007
8:06 am
45199
... It worked just now - I right clicked on the link and downloaded it....
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
8:48 am
45200
... Elsewhere in the rules, 'in combat' always means in close combat. So I would say the -1 does not apply....
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
8:51 am
45201
... The train command doesn't have to be all baggage tho - it is TRAIN - so artillery and WWg can be in it too....
Mike Campbell
mikekiwi2001
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
8:52 am
45202
... And when you unpacked it, was anything in it? Ian _________________________________________________________________ Advertisement: Your Future Starts Here....
Ian Nicoll
davout1806
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
8:54 am
45203
... <snip> ... And the answer is that you never round, up or down. If the list says 10-20, for instance, you must take at least 2.5, and you may take no more...
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:04 am
45204
... allies can be ... it comes ... My particular favourite is the Urartian list - where the cavalry are Cv I, which they never should have been in the first...
stev1485
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:13 am
45205
... I've just updated it again. Should be OK now (although I notice that the version on there seems to be an old-ish one and also the manual seems to have gone...
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:13 am
45206
Classification : SEC=PERSONAL Ah. Good point. Well spotted, that man. Peter B ... From: DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of...
Barrett, Peter
Peter.Barrett@...
Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:14 am
45207
... Yes, I'm well aware that's what the rules USED to be. Since we're discussing new army lists, I thought I'd point out what I believe is an improvement. ......
Ian Nicoll
davout1806
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:19 am
45208
ok, can you give the URL again please? :) Ian ... _________________________________________________________________ Advertisement: Your Future Starts Here....
Ian Nicoll
davout1806
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:20 am
45209
Hi All, Just wondering who should get the Regular Bg(O) option. Any opinions? I know Phil will have the last word, but I think: Most Romans Most Regular...
Ian Nicoll
davout1806
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:22 am
45210
... www.fluffycat.co.uk...
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:29 am
45211
... This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under...
dave.ruddock@...
dave.ruddock
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:40 am
45212
... Where? "In contact" can only mean close combat, but "in combat" must mean any combat. There are lots of places where "close combat" is specifically used ...
Mike Campbell
mikekiwi2001
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:41 am
45213
... on their ... like other ... well. ... way is ... distinguish ... The rule goes on to say 'count the edge first contacted by an enemy front edge as their...
David Thompson
ghandi33
Online Now Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:41 am
45214
... accepted ... and -1 ... Can you please explain what this difficulty is with this? I didn't know there was a problem. ... Can you please be explicit about...
sean_smith_porirua
sean_smith_p...
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:43 am
45215
... Since Phil's implied it's just going to be Romans and Byzantines, on the basis of some rather unclear criteria about baggage personnel being a regular part...
Duncan Head
headd1uk
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:47 am
45216
... It needs to be entirely regular train for the command to count as regular. Page 14 Para 2. David Thompson...
David Thompson
ghandi33
Online Now Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:49 am
45217
... Try again - I just uploaded it again (but the version there is an old one)...
Steve Burt
pyruse
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
9:57 am
45218
... DR: Given that Egyptians had rigid caste and worker structures - even the pyramids were built by skilled labour seemingly, then I would be extremely...
dave.ruddock@...
dave.ruddock
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
10:02 am
45219
Classification : SEC=PERSONAL I would suggest there's a case for at least checking the implications of bland rules covering allies. It can certainly produce...
Barrett, Peter
Peter.Barrett@...
Send Email
May 1, 2007
10:02 am
45220
Classification : SEC=PERSONAL Inca? The notes to the army list describe how rigidly organised society was. Peter B ... From: DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com...
Barrett, Peter
Peter.Barrett@...
Send Email
May 1, 2007
10:12 am
45221
... I think that's at least partly because of how the Aitolians are handled in their own Hell Gk list, not just the ally rules. That will certainly need...
Duncan Head
headd1uk
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2007
10:24 am
Messages 45192 - 45221 of 105879   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help