Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
DBMMlist
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 29382 - 29411 of 105946   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
29382
The title is to distinguish this from Myrt's strand. I've now finished reading Strickland & Hardy "The Great Warbow", which raises the following points. ...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
10:33 am
29383
... From: "Mike Campbell" <mikecampbell@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:53 AM Subject: Re: [DBMMlist] New...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
10:35 am
29384
... From: "graham_briggs" <ukc802924528@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 11:58 AM Subject: [DBMMlist] Re:...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
10:48 am
29385
... From: "Steve Burt" <steve.and.mary.burt@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 3:29 PM Subject: Re: [DBMMlist]...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
10:48 am
29386
... From: "Derek Hannan" <deothoric@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:12 AM Subject: [DBMMlist] Re: Conforming,...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
10:59 am
29387
... From: "John & Yashmin" <johnandyashmin@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 6:04 AM Subject: Re: [DBMMlist]...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:03 am
29388
... From: "graham_briggs" <ukc802924528@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 9:44 AM Subject: [DBMMlist] Re:...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:10 am
29389
... From: "John & Yashmin" <johnandyashmin@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2005 10:10 AM Subject: Re: [DBMMlist]...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:11 am
29390
Re: DBMM rev 13 Jul 05 comments ... From: Doug To: Phil Barker Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:58 AM Subject: Re: DBMM rev 13 Jul 05 comments DISTANCE...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:16 am
29391
... From: "Doug Melville" <dougmelville@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 4:28 AM Subject: [DBMMlist] RE: tasmanians...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:18 am
29392
... From: "Steve Burt" <steve.and.mary.burt@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 10:48 AM Subject: Re: [DBMMlist] Cyrus'...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:21 am
29393
... From: "graham_briggs" <ukc802924528@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 11:10 AM Subject: [DBMMlist] Re:...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:27 am
29394
... From: Myrtilis To: DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 11:33 AM Subject: Re: [DBMMlist] Longbows and POs. Phil Barker...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:29 am
29395
... From: "Derek Hannan" <deothoric@...> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 1:26 PM Subject: [DBMMlist] Re: Conforming...
Phil Barker
damnbarkeragain
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:33 am
29396
... <SNIP> ... Peter Pig ... So do I. And we agree that AP for BwS is still wrong? Regards, Chris Jolley...
Chris Jolley
chrisjolley2003
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
12:13 pm
29397
... Who were htehy shot down by, and which archers were over-run? There's lots of Bw(I) in the Early Burgundians........ ... -1 for mouted infantry that still...
Mike Campbell
mikekiwi2001
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:14 pm
29398
... I've used it. It is useful if you have two smallish, nimble commands which need good PIPs, but not necessarily very high PIPs (ie, you need 3+ with both...
Bill
turenneuk
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:26 pm
29399
... Well at least one of us has been reading it wrong. I read the original to mean that plashing could not be seen, not that plashing disclosed troops. After...
Bill
turenneuk
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
1:37 pm
29400
... <snip> ... Nor did the early firearms it seems, hence the introduction of the larger bore Musket when the smaller bore arquebus couldn't penetrate ...
Bill
turenneuk
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
2:03 pm
29401
... And anyway, it's assumed in every shooting encounter that some shots miss and some shots don't penetrate or are sufficiently minor wounds as not to...
John & Yashmin
johnedmundson
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
7:34 pm
29402
... Personally, I don't think anyone deserves the +2 when winning! ... This would need the introduction of some kind of mobile obstacle (MO) as has been...
John & Yashmin
johnedmundson
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
7:40 pm
29403
Hi gang, Phil, ... Alternatively, the effectiveness of overhead shooting could be reduced. My attempt to do this by changing the -1 on enemy to +1 for self was...
David Brown
dfmbrown@...
Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
8:54 pm
29404
Phil asked; ... Well, like others I think the +2 for (S) shooting is too much. But it becomes palatable if Bw(S) can only shoot from one rank*. I'll have a...
John Garvey
platypus01au
Offline Send Email
Oct 1, 2005
11:54 pm
29405
MikeC responding to Phil; ... ? But Phil is saying they shot _better_! And with the Burgundians the archers arn't holding the horses so there is the same...
John Garvey
platypus01au
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
12:02 am
29406
... redefine Bw(X) as those archers equipped and prepared to fight hand-to-hand indefinitely, shooting as Bw(O), and fighting in close combat as Bd(I) vs foot,...
Mike Campbell
mikekiwi2001
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
12:04 am
29407
... I see what you mean - I had read it as "Troops not disclosed by shooting out and [Troops not disclosed by] plashing cannot be seen ..." - I don't use...
Mike Campbell
mikekiwi2001
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
12:06 am
29408
... Thye shot better but got rid of their horses - this is a mechanism to encourage tehm to get rid of their horses as mounted infantry seem to have usually...
Mike Campbell
mikekiwi2001
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
12:08 am
29409
... I like this. There is not much evidence AFAIK that mounted infantry actually did tactically maneuvers on the battlefield once they deployed. Any that did...
John & Janice Sanderc...
feanorbirmans
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
12:27 am
29410
... Very true. But instead of using tactical factors to encourage a certain behavior, I'd rather the rules force the behaviour. Especially if the mechanism is...
John Garvey
platypus01au
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
3:05 am
29411
... I wouldn't bother with additional range bands, or if anything, a flat +40p if uphill. +1 for shooting from uphill might be OK though; it would also imply...
John & Yashmin
johnedmundson
Offline Send Email
Oct 2, 2005
4:41 am
Messages 29382 - 29411 of 105946   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help