----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill" <turenne@...>
To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2007 7:40 PM
Subject: [DBMMlist] Re: Naval landing forces question


> --- In DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com, "Phil Barker" <pc.barker@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Peter Kershaw" <Theswamp@...>
>> To: <DBMMlist@yahoogroups.com>
>> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 3:10 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DBMMlist] Re: Naval landing forces question
>>
>>
>> > Yep - and Gal(S) aren't allowed on WW (only boats, ships and
>> > (Gal (F) and I)).
>> >
>> > PK
>>
>> Pity no one pointed this out before finalisation. I blame all those
>> shy retiring Chinese experts of ours...
>>
>> Phil
>
> Sorry, I think I spotted something like this during the various drafts
> of the rules, but as galley gradings were being being shifted about so
> much, I assumed it would be sorted by regrading out in the army lists.
>
> Of course, by then I'd forgotten about it.
>
> So while I think about it, List IV/63 Aztec, the WW becomes S or L
> according to the appendix III.
>
> Presumably, lake Texcoco is the L (not sure what the S represents).
> However, the Spanish Brigantines in list IV/19 which fought on Lake
> Texcoco are classed as Gal(F) & only boats can go on L.

If some one reminds me at the right time, they can be Bts (S). They were
sailed and rowed and were transported across land. And did not have a ram.

Phil