... wide. ... Yes, that terrain piece would be fine. Anything that's extra, just for appearance, is completely ignored as far as the rules are concerned. -...
Well, I'm not getting much response from the Fanaticus Forum, so I figure I'll try here. Since Baier went with his wife to Florida in Sept he can't make it...
Somebody, bid 7 no trump, thats the highest bid available (in bridge) ... From: [mailto: Prowler10@...] To: DBA@yahoogroups.com Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006...
When last I checked, The Game Matrix store in Tacoma, Washington (USA) had about dozen copies of DBA 2.2. http://www.thegamematrix.com/ //Paul in Seattle...
Brian- You should get on the GLADBAG mailing list here at Yahoo! Groups. (GLADBAG = Great Lakes Area DBA Gamers) Any DBA events in the region get announced...
While looking for something else, I saw at warweb.com that they have listed "DBA 2.2 - Back in Stock". It looks like a new print run has been distributed. ...
I have a couple of ideas to share. I had assumed both would be pretty commonly in use, but when I was at a convention this fall, other players said they had...
... can then ... decorate ... These are pretty widespread in the tournements I play in, ranging from plain cardboard to drawings done the the player's...
This is strategy boardgame that I designed about 10 years ago. Ancient Empires. My website has some rules for using the game as a campaign setting for...
Hi all, A little conundrum about shooting shooters. The rules say that "Elements of different sides that can shoot at each other must do so." But what about...
If all three BBB/bbb elements can shoot at each other, they must do so. One of the two BBB aids the shooting of the other. It would be the same in either...
I disagree, one bow must fire at another bow/warwagon/artillery (if the bow/ warwabon/ artillery can fire back. The attacker can chose to fire extra bows...
There has been a lot of discussion on this in the past. Someone (I'll blame Bob B.) quoted Phil the Great as saying: all shooters must fire at each other and...
First very few ancient/medieval troops actually "fired" which implies some use of fire (this is true, of course, for later era cannons), mostly they shot. The...
Chris there is a club in Brisbane that I would recommend. It is the Brisbane Independent Gamers. It meetsw 4th Sunday of the month at the serbian hall at...
... can ... keeping ... Bob, it is true that an element in support shoots, but it is not shot back, so it does not count in "shoot at each other", neither if...
I have a question, and using the 'search messages' option, I think I've found part of an answer... here's the whole question: Can an element receive...
... I thought I would respond to this, pointing out that the word shoot comes from the term shot, refering to the round balls that go into muskets, hand...
The rule says: Spears, Blades or Auxilia add +1 if fighting Warband, mounted troops, or BUA while supported by a single friendly element of Psiloi lined up in...
I disagree. The rule does not say "if shot at, it must shoot back". The rules say: "elements ... that CAN shoot at each other MUST DO SO." And "A second or...
Those Sp with a Sp directly behind and with a Ps to their diagonal rear would indeed get two support factors against Kn. However, only the Sp behind would...
... back". The ... but you forget the AT EACH OTHER. "At each other" means some there is some reciprocity: if A shoot at B and B shoots at A they are shooting...
I've been playing DBA 2.0 for a long time, but I will be attending a convention soon, where 2.2 appears to be the rule-set of choice. Do I need to go out and...
Buy the new rules. Some changes are trivial, but you do not want to be attacking a Wb in the woods with your blades, now that the Wb are not -2 in bad going....
Well, let's just agree to disagree. Terry in Spokane _____ From: DBA@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DBA@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Attilio Andreazza Sent: Tuesday,...
... It doesn't help me (as the asker of the original question) though. My take is that Attilio is closer to the rules as written, but that I get the impression...
If you need a tie breaker, here is Phil's last comment on this Bob: The following rule has caused some confusion. Most players ... Bob beattie@... ... It...
I just didn't want to get into the loop of repeating the same arguments and quoting the same rules over and over. However, I am always willing to be...
EGAD! Phil says the second Bw doesn't have to shoot at the enemy Bw? Well Bob correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this a 180 degree turn from his former stance...
