Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ColonialWars · A mailing list devoted to Colonial Wargames and warfare in the 1800's. wargame, wargames, war, battle, military, simulation,
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
The Wind and the Lion Question   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #88807 of 90001 |
Re: [ColonialWars] Re: The Wind and the Lion Question

wow, you was a jarhead?

I was USMC 1965-1971, 0211/0251/8611 with Chinese Mandarin and Korean at DLI.
Attended CAP school in Danang for Vietnamese.


----- Original Message -----
From: baddawg6us
To: ColonialWars@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 2:24 PM
Subject: [ColonialWars] Re: The Wind and the Lion Question







WELL DAN DALY(i think it was him) was the USMC ranker i used as a source, and
he says he was bustin' caps into the BOXERS with a 6mm LEE straight pull bolt
action rifle, and i would tend to believe him over any other official sources.
he was there, on the wall at PEKING and not in an office compiling official data
. . .

but then i am extremely doubtful about a lot of "official sources" when
compared to folks version who actually attended the dance. this is based largely
upon the plethora of inaccuracies i am always finding concerning events in the
RVN that i actually took part in, and not compiled from unit war diaries or
official histories by some one who manned the TOC at the time ,or an office
miles and maybe years away from the actual events. . . .

i always get two USMC double MEDAL OF HONOR winners confused. one was an
enlisted man and the other was an officer. they were both on active duty at the
same time.

if CHESTY PULLER had been more of a yes man instead of a fighting man, he
would have been a MOH, possibly a multiple MOH winner too. instead since he was
what he was and came from either VMI or THE CITADEL, he had to make do with a
mere five NAVY CROSSES . . . .

DAWGIE, puting on his best barrel chested, bulldog face look, and eyeballing
the situation . . . .

--- In ColonialWars@yahoogroups.com, "Graydon Gorby" <thegorb@...> wrote:
>
> --- In ColonialWars@yahoogroups.com, "Graydon Gorby" <thegorb@> wrote:
>
> > I was watching the marines double time through Tangier and found
> > myself wondering what rifles they were carrying.
>
> Thanks to everyone who replied to this question.
>
> The answer is:
> The U.S. Model 1896 Krag Jorgensen rifle.
>
> I ran across this website:
> http://www.imfdb.com
> Which is the Internet Movie Firearms Database. Dedicated solely to listing
the specific firearms that appeared in every movie ever made.
>
> Now, whether the marines in WatL should have been armed with the M1895 Navy
Lee rather than the Krag is open to dispute.
>
> Marines in the Asiatic Fleet were issued Krags as early as 1900, four years
before the WatL takes place so it is quite likely they would have been used.
>
> Regards, Graydon
>





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Thu Jul 2, 2009 6:09 am

martinisword9
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #88807 of 90001 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello all, I was watching the marines double time through Tangier and found myself wondering what rifles they were carrying. Figured someone on this list would...
Graydon Gorby
thegorbcw
Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2009
5:36 pm

I believe they were 1903 Springfield rifles.   Ron V. ________________________________ From: Graydon Gorby <thegorb@...> To: ColonialWars@yahoogroups.com...
RON VAUGHAN
ronaldvaugha...
Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2009
6:03 pm

Since the Perdicaris Incident took place in May 1904 it's probably the correct rifle, depending if the Marines were issued them in time. Otherwise, the...
martinisword9
Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2009
6:56 pm

I thought the Lee Navy was issued in 6mm Navy, and it was issued in 1895 and continued in production until 1902. But in 1904, the Marines, being a bit behind...
Robert Campbell
llebpmac_bob2
Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2009
9:33 pm

There was of course the 1885 Remington-Lee which was used by the Navy earlier in .45/70, but the Marines used the Lee Navy in the Boxer Rebellion, so likely...
Robert Campbell
llebpmac_bob2
Offline Send Email
Apr 16, 2009
9:38 pm

Hi I had an old memory of seeing pics of the Krag. I know that in the period in china, the marines and army were in mix and match uniforms, both blue and...
rfrusso@...
RockyRusso
Offline Send Email
Apr 17, 2009
2:08 am

... Thanks to everyone who replied to this question. The answer is: The U.S. Model 1896 Krag Jorgensen rifle. I ran across this website: http://www.imfdb.com ...
Graydon Gorby
thegorbcw
Offline Send Email
May 17, 2009
4:50 pm

The link isn't working.  Can you please recheck it? Thanks. Bob Burke ... From: Graydon Gorby <thegorb@...> To: ColonialWars@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sun, 17...
burker1@...
burker94509
Offline Send Email
May 17, 2009
9:06 pm

... I checked it and the coreect link is http://www.imfdb.org. It's a little hard to figure out but when i plugged in the name of the firearm it located the...
jerrylannigan
Offline Send Email
May 17, 2009
10:26 pm

Jerry,   Got it.  Thanks. Bob Burke ... From: jerrylannigan <mltryhstrn@...> To: ColonialWars@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sun, 17 May 2009 3:26 pm Subject:...
burker1@...
burker94509
Offline Send Email
May 17, 2009
10:31 pm

WELL DAN DALY(i think it was him) was the USMC ranker i used as a source, and he says he was bustin' caps into the BOXERS with a 6mm LEE straight pull bolt...
baddawg6us
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
4:48 am

Smedley Butler Daly was in the pokey sober'n up when the fight'n broke out from what I recall...
rttakezo2000
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
2:17 pm

Sorry, after being released from the stocks...don't mean to create confusion. Yes, Dan did receive the MOH for actions. Always wondered just how drunk he was...
rttakezo2000
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
2:22 pm

wow, you was a jarhead? I was USMC 1965-1971, 0211/0251/8611 with Chinese Mandarin and Korean at DLI. Attended CAP school in Danang for Vietnamese. ... From:...
martinisword9
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
6:22 pm

NO, i am one of the "BLACK SHEEP" of the family. like my paternal grandfather i was a dawgface soldier in the 1st INF DIV as a grunt on one RVN tour, served...
baddawg6us
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
9:42 pm

Hi I don't remember from the movie, but they should have been carrying the 30/40 Krag-Jorgenson. They are the first of our smokeless rifles, and fairly cheap...
rfrusso@...
RockyRusso
Offline Send Email
Jun 30, 2009
2:57 pm

... Are you sure of that? I believe the Marines would've been armed with the Navy Winchester-Lee in 6mm. Or did they switch to the Krag after 1900?...
jeff_ewing_1999
Online Now Send Email
Jun 30, 2009
4:40 pm

ROCKY, i do not remember the exact time frame of THE WIND AND THE LION, but US NAVY and USMC were still using 6-mm LEE straight pull magazine rifles during the...
baddawg6us
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2009
5:33 am

We had this discussion last May Try this link: http://www.imfdb.org/index.php/Wind_and_the_Lion%2C_The ... From: baddawg6us To: ColonialWars@yahoogroups.com ...
martinisword9
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2009
4:13 pm

Hi Oddly, the post below was one I did A LONG time ago when we were discussing the movie! Love the internet, sometimes slower than mail. Lee, on the other...
rfrusso@...
RockyRusso
Offline Send Email
Jul 1, 2009
5:32 am

There may be another possibility. There was another "Lee" rifle that had good stopping power from a slightly earlier time period. That was the .45/70...
Kent McClure
kmmc56
Offline Send Email
Jul 3, 2009
5:25 am

Hi I think the only quibble I have and had on the "Lee" is related to the movie trying to find one. Simply, what I have is that they only made 10,000 of them....
rfrusso@...
RockyRusso
Offline Send Email
Jul 2, 2009
4:47 am
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help