Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ARMATI · In support of the ARMATI historical miniatures game, by Arty Conliffe.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 32356 - 32385 of 32777   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
32356
Gentlemen, My Battle Day experience has drawn to a close. Thanks to each and all for the comments, remarks, suggestions with respect to orders of battle, rule...
centurion5790
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2009
1:35 am
32357
I will be out of the office starting 02/05/2009 and will not return until 18/05/2009. I will respond to your message when I return. If you require immediate ...
mark.jefferies@...
Send Email
May 4, 2009
2:26 am
32358
There appears an Armati rule; "A Division may never be split up just because part of it is obliged to Charge." Why is this so? Let's say a line of knights...
brusilov50
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2009
7:53 am
32359
I never read the sentence in the strict sense that you seem to give it. IMO, the sentence says that you may not separate the part of a division which is under...
AUGER Vincent
auger_1964
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2009
11:48 am
32360
Vincent is correct, Splits are generally to your advantage - they free up manoeuvre units (at the cost of initiative). Hence, you can't do them whenever you...
mark.grindlay@...
mark_grindla...
Offline Send Email
May 4, 2009
12:28 pm
32361
... . A: this statement is not 100% accurate, the other units in the Divisions can take a split and try to get into the melee, or (without seeing the table and...
emanfpc
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2009
11:05 am
32362
Not sure if the prior post is entirely accurate. If you take a voluntary split with Knights you still fall under a obligatory charge and you must move straight...
Robert W Jones
light.colonel
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2009
3:43 pm
32363
... You are right Rob. If both armies have used up their splits it is technically possible for two unengaged knight units to face each other at an angle where...
Roy Boss
aligern
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2009
3:48 pm
32364
... hi rob, what's inaccurate ...his complaint was about a unit stuck and not being able to fight, so I was just trying to point out options such as an echelon...
emanfpc
Offline Send Email
May 8, 2009
5:08 pm
32365
Yes, I understand all that is below as well as Vincent's earlier message. It all makes sense if you automatically suppose that an obligatory charge cannot...
brusilov50
Offline Send Email
May 10, 2009
3:41 am
32366
okay, I uploaded a picture of my question into the Photo section. It is the first one listed. It's listed as "1 obligatory halt". As you can see, it's 2...
brusilov50
Offline Send Email
May 10, 2009
3:46 am
32367
Has anyone who is a Forum member wargamed this historic engagement? Would you mind if I took a look at the orders of battle you used? Did you draft any special...
centurion5790
Offline Send Email
May 10, 2009
11:50 am
32368
hi, from the picture you posted, I don't see the problem (but this is just me) you stated your case as Knights charging Knights, and from your picture, the red...
emanfpc
Offline Send Email
May 10, 2009
12:39 pm
32369
I agree with emanfpc. If the receiving kinghts have not moved (or moved less than half, making them support charge eligible), they will be pulled forwards by...
Mark Grindlay
mark_grindla...
Offline Send Email
May 10, 2009
2:04 pm
32370
Received this from a friend of mine and couldn't find an answer from my sources.... ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
May 12, 2009
3:24 pm
32371
Just returned to Armati after spending a while playing other rules (mainly Crusader). Anyway. Just thought I'd expand my Normans into an Anglo-Norman army and...
durulz2000
Offline Send Email
May 12, 2009
5:12 pm
32372
Thanks. I can buy the rationale that what I am after simply takes place over more than the initial turn of occurrence. A charge is not entirely resolved...
brusilov50
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2009
3:36 pm
32373
Anglo-Norman War wagons!!! Hmmm ... are you referring to the single Carrico style wagon used by the Bishop of Durham at the Battle of the Standard? As that's...
MARK FRY
mark584036
Offline Send Email
May 13, 2009
7:33 pm
32374
hi, as far as I know, no one really knows, that information was lost over time, but it was winter and Varus had sent most of his Auxiliary units to winter in...
emanfpc
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
10:52 am
32375
Within the terms of the situaton or problem you propose (knight vs knight) the charge is not resolved that turn. In the original rules, Arty is against the...
Chris Hahn
centurion5790
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
1:58 pm
32376
Chris, An interesting question. We have mulled over the impetus abilities of mounted a few times. Game play wise, its reasonably easy to see why all HC get...
Mark Grindlay
mark_grindla...
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
2:29 pm
32377
Thanks. I'll pass it on. Chris ... [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
3:42 pm
32378 centurion5790
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
5:37 pm
32379
Hello, Trying to get my head around Armati. Everything looks good so far, but I was looking at the deployment rules, and had a question. The "no baseline...
chris_milne10
Online Now Send Email
May 14, 2009
8:57 pm
32380
In a message dated 5/14/2009 3:53:13 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, emanfpc@... writes: hi, as far as I know, no one really knows, that information was...
sfp55@...
steveatglobpro
Offline Send Email
May 14, 2009
11:48 pm
32381
The restriction is not as restrictive as it first appears. Put more simply, you can not put heavy infantry on the wings. Pretty much everything else goes. ...
mark.grindlay@...
mark_grindla...
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
5:53 am
32382
Blimey guys - you all seem to be full of misinformation (polite term for 'rubbish') on this subject. 1). It was NOT winter - it was September AD09 - so that's...
MARK FRY
mark584036
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
11:25 am
32383
Yes even with this rule, gamey tactics have developed ! A widely acknowledged problem with the deployment rules frequently observed in competitive Armati games...
bright464
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
11:42 am
32384
From an Armati view point - the Warflute 'Garrison Roman' would make a good starting point for Varus' force. I'd limit the munbers of archers on the Roman side...
mark584036
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
11:50 am
32385
blow it out your bleep ...oh look at you, you're so smart, aren't we impressed ...not ... sadly for you, you are the one with the wrong information, yes it was...
emanfpc
Offline Send Email
May 15, 2009
12:46 pm
Messages 32356 - 32385 of 32777   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help