Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ARMATI · In support of the ARMATI historical miniatures game, by Arty Conliffe.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 31959 - 31988 of 32777   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
31959
Happy New Year to all. After 3 month play testing and discussion here is an overview of where I believe we are at. The things that need work are evident. May I...
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
12:56 pm
31960
Rodge, I would change 14b, so that whenever a key unit breaks, all units check within 3" regardless of rout path. Rob ... From: rodger1uk To:...
Robert W Jones
light.colonel
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
1:56 pm
31961
... check within 3" regardless of rout path. Hi Rob, This was discussed a while back but the 'area effect' at 3" (for reasons I cannot recall) was not taken...
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
4:07 pm
31962
... <snip> Seems to have been adopted. <snip> Really? I seem to remember a debate on making stationary for bracing 'this turn' to match the terrain advantage....
ashley.solo
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
4:50 pm
31963
Hi Rodge, I just assumed that "key" units are the meat of the army and as they break it could potentially cause panic, maybe if the unattached general is...
Robert W Jones
light.colonel
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
4:57 pm
31964
Happy New Year too! As an aside some people did say 'I vote for this/i vote for that'. Was there a poll? Did anyone count the opinions? As a solo player, I...
ashley.solo
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
5:01 pm
31965
I'm afraid that 'this turn' was not accepted after debate Ash, and this rule was not slipped in under any wire, it was agreed upon by the majority. Neither was...
Rodger Williams
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
5:21 pm
31966
Thanks for the advice Rodge. Despite your implication, playing the game is how I reach my conclusions. ... this rule ... bracing ... Behalf Of ... turn' to ......
ashley.solo
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
5:31 pm
31967
What implication Ash? There was none meant. And if you have played the rule then you should see how it works. If anyone was doing the implying it was you with...
Rodger Williams
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
5:35 pm
31968
Yes, there was a poll, and yes people voted. Yes, I counted the opinions. Have a look back at the posts in late August/early September to see the 'voting'...
Rodger Williams
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
5:36 pm
31969
Thanks for doing this Rodger. Lots of work here. I seem to have missed this proposal in the flurry: Rear Attacks Rear attacks occur when the attacker starts...
Christopher Leach
sausagesca
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
6:07 pm
31970
Hi Chris, This was a proposal that was discussed after play testing found an anomaly (the inabilty to perform a charge from the rear that contacted the flank...
Rodger Williams
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
6:53 pm
31971
The significance in Rob's comment is not the area of effect but that fact that at the moment a non-key Heavy unit causes panic however a key light unit does...
bright464
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
8:13 pm
31972
It is a good point; the b) version of the rout test is not one I use. I think Steve P is best placed to comment on this. ... From: ARMATI@yahoogroups.com...
Rodger Williams
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
8:32 pm
31973
... 3 inches must test. Remember please that armies often have 4 0or 5 break points. A rout test that could break or debilitate three or four key units in a go...
Roy Boss
aligern
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
11:34 pm
31974
... happy New Year! Roy ... of ... the ... Shield ... must ... wide ... Keil ... with ... status ... 12a ... able ... conditions ... which ... (PH) ... cannot ...
Roy Boss
aligern
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
11:36 pm
31975
... There are hardly any non key heavy units. If there are any such as Sassanid levy then having them not cause rout throughs says 'Put a line of levy in front...
Roy Boss
aligern
Offline Send Email
Jan 3, 2009
11:40 pm
31976
In a message dated 1/3/2009 4:56:30 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, rodger.w@... writes: After 3 month play testing and discussion here is an overview of ...
sfp55@...
steveatglobpro
Offline Send Email
Jan 4, 2009
8:04 am
31977
(happy new year all) I second this thought of SPP's. 3 bracing: "SP: Several comments. Once the melee commences unit cannot considered being braced, especial...
mark.grindlay@...
mark_grindla...
Offline Send Email
Jan 4, 2009
11:41 am
31978
"Melee is not a stationary action. I understand why it was included - players do not like the idea of a second unit delaying the charge and then hitting on...
Rodger Williams
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 4, 2009
6:30 pm
31979
Happy new year to all Thanks for the summary Rodge. Please find my comment below. Best regards Vincent ... VA: I playtested only twice, intended goal (more...
AUGER Vincent
auger_1964
Online Now Send Email
Jan 5, 2009
3:32 pm
31980
In a message dated 1/3/2009 4:56:30 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, rodger.w@... writes: 8) Double Frontage LI and LHI Expansion of LI and LHI into two...
sfp55@...
steveatglobpro
Offline Send Email
Jan 6, 2009
10:16 am
31981
Thanks Steve and thanks Vincent for your comprehensive feedback. Mark G , Ash and Chris I have noted your thoughts. Does anyone want to expand on the posts...
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 6, 2009
11:21 am
31982
Sorry guys but saying that a unit in melee is moving may look nice on paper, however it does not, IMO, stand up to a close review of game impacts. The issue...
AUGER Vincent
auger_1964
Online Now Send Email
Jan 8, 2009
12:47 pm
31983
My previous post was eventually published after several unsuccessful tries on my part in the last 3 days. I guess that the error came from the title I had...
AUGER Vincent
auger_1964
Online Now Send Email
Jan 8, 2009
12:50 pm
31984
its a pretty good argument too. I feel over-ruled on this one already ________________________________ From: AUGER Vincent <vincent.auger@...> To:...
Mark Grindlay
mark_grindla...
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2009
4:40 pm
31985
... Roy ... on ... game ... warband ... FT ... me...
Roy Boss
aligern
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2009
5:08 pm
31986
Sorry, have been away from the computer. Glad you posted this; completely agree Vincent. Cheers Rodge ... From: ARMATI@yahoogroups.com...
Rodger Williams
rodger1uk
Offline Send Email
Jan 8, 2009
8:31 pm
31987
Hi, we're starting to get back into playing Armati and we're looking for some help with the rules. In the CTZ section it basically says that a unit cannot...
emanfpc
Offline Send Email
Jan 18, 2009
11:57 pm
31988
You have it correct. The crossing of both flank lines in front of an enemy is relative to that enemy ability to march into your flank while you pass -...
mark.grindlay@...
mark_grindla...
Offline Send Email
Jan 19, 2009
7:42 am
Messages 31959 - 31988 of 32777   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help