Another one of your bold pronouncements Steve (on both the Byzantine lists). Â Pray upon what basis do you base these comments & also when you state that:...
Dear all The next Battle Day will take place on Saturday 25 April 2009, at the usual venue in Bletchley near Milton Keynes The 2009 battle will be Callinicum...
Chris does like his terrain, though ;). The real answer is that Armati terrain is very abstract already. A SH with WD over it is just a WD. ash ... example,...
Here was the situation: Let XXXXX represent a unit of Elephants with FV of 5[3]2. Let HHHHH represent an enemy PH unit, the right end of 6-unit division. XXXXX...
Here was the situation: Let XXXXX represent a unit of LI. Let HHHHH represent one unit of a 2-unit enemy HC division. Let KKKKKK represent the other unit of a...
On the second turn of a recent game pitting Seleucids against Ptolemaic formations, a melee initiated by two units of javelins and one of slingers against...
The questions. the elephant. Obligatory charges must be performed without any wheel. If you have to wheel to do it, it is not obligatory, it is voluntary...
A few clarifications and additional comments below Best regards Vincent ... An obligatory charge must finish in contact with the enemy. With the distances...
Armies: Over the past week or so, I have play tested the proposed RVs three times. The first game pitted a Gepid Army (400 A.D. to 565 A.D.) - H@4, L@3, BP of...
I am planning to try Armati for the first time and have a DBA Nikephorian Byzantine Army I want to use. The Cataphracts or heavy Knights are based 6 to a 60mm...
Brian, Â I pitty your opponent, but good luck anyway. Â Ideally they should both be based 40 mm frontages. Armati basing for depths will have one section of...
At our test game last week (or perhaps it was 10 days ago now I think about it) we set out to test warbands in a 100 point encounter between Odovacer and Rugi...
Mark Grindlay would like to note that he still favours the 45 degree rule as the simplest and best flank rear definition. Just because I came up with the IF...
... the ... Their ... them to non ... Thanks for your "two cents" Steve. Resistance didn't really enter into my thinking. I was more "concerned" about the...
... But 45 degree frontal arc as for the bowfire definition is wrng because. 1) The bowfire arc should be from the centre point of the shooting unit and thus...
In a message dated 10/14/2008 3:24:58 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, centurion5790@... writes: Again, given the numbers involved, it just occurred to me...
Steve, Â Can you recall any actuality to the tale of Alexanders veterans rolling under the pike heads and cutting up newer Phalanxes during the wars of the...
Brian, I have just realised you may be playing 28mm. you can probably disregard my reply earlier this week, except the general point to aim for same frontage...
Er, no, Mark - he's giving standard WRG 15mm base sizes (probably thrown you by giving the depth first (60x40 is KnI double-based element), the foot is BwX, I...
If it starts entirely in front, it is a frontal charge, wherever it finishes. Otherwise, if contacts the rear edge or rear corner it is a flank or rear charge....
... In terms of the variants that we are discussing where the charge starts is less relevant than where it finishes. To get full flank rear effect it must...
Not as such roy. Current 14a rv means that the attacker may contact a target unit and as long at it's (the attaker's) frontage crosses both the target's flank...
The example terroircathars gave was where a 2 unit div of LC (both units in deep) had got round the flank of an HC unit. The LC Div was well to the rear of the...
so thats three conditions for something most other rules count as dead easy.  Must begin at A or B and be x AND y <barker colon> OR z ?  doesn't look like...
Don’t agree You can start the attack from in front of the unit with the 45 degree rule. r ... From: ARMATI@yahoogroups.com [mailto:ARMATI@yahoogroups.com] On...
I can't remember when the play-test period ends or if discussion is 'allowed', but here it goes (ignore if this contravenes the intended procedures). I'm...
its probably worth pointing out that I can not remember playing or seeing a report from a 100 pt + wide heavy foot game, where there was a flank attack...
There have been 2 instances in our playtesting where 14a has been used. I will try and get them accuratly reported. There has , however, been more instnces...