Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ARMATI · In support of the ARMATI historical miniatures game, by Arty Conliffe.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 24945 - 24974 of 32775   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
24945
As I said earlier in this thread, the rules are as written. But that shouldn't stop people experimenting with changes that they consider give them a game they...
Victoria Grant
victoria221629
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
2:15 pm
24946
Hi - i wonder if anyone can help me... I am looking into entering the Armati competion at Britcon in Manchester and have emailed for additional infomation but...
scruff333
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
4:29 pm
24947
Hello to the members of this list This is my first post here. I am still reading Armati rules and deciding if worth playing or not, so I read with interest the...
Myrtilis
myrtili
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
4:52 pm
24948
forgive me if this sounds like an advert, but I just found a great site that is offering two great samurai games that have only been available in Japan for...
amilne70
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
4:53 pm
24949
In a message dated 6/1/2006 9:58:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time, myrtili@... writes: Sometime ago there was a debate on AncMed and TNE about mounted...
sfp55@...
steveatglobpro
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
5:28 pm
24950
Hi Sean Have you tried the contacts through the BHGS website? http://www.bhgs.co.uk/ and follow the links through events and Britcon? There is an email address...
Paul Murgatroyd
paulmurgatroyd
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
6:55 pm
24951
HI - many thanks for the reply. I have tried one of these emails (at least one, at least the one for Mark fry: this was the one that bounced back. i will try...
scruff333
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
7:39 pm
24952
Steve, I think his statement was qualified. He wondered if there was evidence of "successful" charges. What were the outcomes of the charges mentioned by the ...
Aidan Roseberry
aidan_roseberry
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
7:48 pm
24953
In a message dated 6/1/2006 12:49:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time, paleryder1@... writes: He wondered if there was evidence of "successful" charges. What...
sfp55@...
steveatglobpro
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
8:14 pm
24954
Outstanding! Thanks. Aidan ... _________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today...
Aidan Roseberry
aidan_roseberry
Offline Send Email
Jun 1, 2006
8:48 pm
24955
I agree wholeheartedly about requiring a uit to start and end behind the flank to claim a flank attack. We tested that idea pretty thoroughly here and it made...
Subodai Bahadur
tsubodaibogatyr
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
12:33 am
24956
There are extracts of Livy on cavalry versus infantry in the Files section of this site. Wherever the mounted versus infantry file is, it is much, much larger....
Subodai Bahadur
tsubodaibogatyr
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
12:47 am
24957
Ooops! IIRC, each pretty much every paragraph in the File Cavalry versus Infantry is an excerpt describing a separate confrontation reported by Livy. Sorry....
Subodai Bahadur
tsubodaibogatyr
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
12:50 am
24958
I am sure BarKochva records the routing of roman infantry by a Selucid cataphract charge ... mentioned by the ... charge ... Megarians. ... them ... exact...
williamlwilson
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
11:52 am
24959
... behind ... Well, it's good to see you agree 'wholeheartedly', but I think your support may be a little rash. I've created a new Photo Album called 'Flank...
durulz2000
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
11:57 am
24960
Wasnt that at Magnesia vs a fairly raw legion and the charge was frontal ? Legion on the roman right ? Steve...
stephen switzer
chosroes2002
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:03 pm
24961
... Roman left, Seleukid catafracts led by Antiochos in a frontal charge. The troops hit were probably the left win Latin ala although to all intentts these...
nikgaukroger
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:07 pm
24962
As I understand the rule if you contact the rear corner you could then extend your front beyond your opponents and still count as a rear attack. Therefore in...
williamlwilson
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:12 pm
24963
Yes it was to the front, however, I do not think it was a raw legion. If I recall correctly BK was cynical regarding Roman claims that it was anything other...
williamlwilson
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:12 pm
24964
Sorry I remember from a GMT board wargame. They were graded as raw in that. Good game for a board game. Steve...
stephen switzer
chosroes2002
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:13 pm
24965
... ...................................... I agree that your example is a frontal attack within the rules. In order to gain the advanatge of a flank attack...
mbsparta
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:27 pm
24966
Don't see how it is a 'WRG manoueuvre' (whatever that could possibly be) for two reasons: 1/ I don't play WRG rules. 2/ The Armati rules say quite clearly that...
durulz2000
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:35 pm
24967
You are, of course, absolutely correct. My point is, though, that classifying it as a frontal attack is self-evidently wrong. This, I think, could dissuade...
durulz2000
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
1:47 pm
24968
If you post your email I will forward you a copy of the Britcon form...
williamlwilson
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
2:06 pm
24969
Odd thing that. Apparently, Armati fails to make sense in virtually every way and yet it is the best set of rules on the market Odd thing that. Luxor ... ...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
2:08 pm
24970
... This assumes the unit attacking can wheel and move. Or isn't an obligatory charger. ... work. ... begin ... of the ... No, it doesn't, it looks at where...
Victoria Grant
victoria221629
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
2:13 pm
24971
I do not see why it is ironic that it is easier to achieve a rear attack than a flank attack when you are starting behind your opponent My point is a) a slight...
williamlwilson
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
2:22 pm
24972
Yeah, and apparently all the army lists in the rule book are rubbish and need replaced... ;) Vicki ... is ... is ... you ... rear...
Victoria Grant
victoria221629
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
2:29 pm
24973
... Could not agree more Vicki, these British light chariots are far too cheap :-) ... rubbish...
williamlwilson
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
2:52 pm
24974
Thanks, that will be interesting. Please quote book, chapter and translation, if possible. Myrt sfp55@... wrote: In a message dated 6/1/2006 12:49:22 PM...
Myrtilis
myrtili
Offline Send Email
Jun 2, 2006
3:36 pm
Messages 24945 - 24974 of 32775   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help