Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
ARMATI · In support of the ARMATI historical miniatures game, by Arty Conliffe.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 15358 - 15387 of 32772   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
15358
Hi, I finally played my first game of A2. My regular opponent, Ken Eckhardt, and I played. I don't have my copy yet but the basics were still there. We played...
Michael O'Brien
lordkalvanof...
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
9:01 am
15359
I understand that if HC win the 1st round of melee against HI, that the HI would be destroyed unless deployed in depth. Does HC get any wider bonus when...
borodino2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
9:38 am
15360
I re-read what I posted. As far as I can tell I may have implied that you were pompous yourself, accused you of sarcasm & retorted that some of your comments...
NSP16@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
12:04 pm
15361
In a message dated 01/04/2004 03:00:47 GMT Standard Time, ARMATI@yahoogroups.com writes: Guys the way I saw it is that Chariot runners assigned to a chariot...
NSP16@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
12:04 pm
15362
In a message dated 01/04/2004 03:00:47 GMT Standard Time, ARMATI@yahoogroups.com writes: Neil, I don't suppose you have a scanner to scan these and put them...
NSP16@...
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
12:08 pm
15363
As I said. if you wish to continue this, then take it off line. Luxor ... that you ... of your ... launch this ... been removed]...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
12:54 pm
15364
Unfortunately, this is not what the rules (old or new) say. The Chariot and the runners are seperate divisions. What Steve is quoting is one of his 'house'...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
12:59 pm
15365
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the ARMATI group: Should BiblicalChariot runners be LI or SI o They should be LI o They should be SI o...
ARMATI@yahoogroups.com
Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
1:02 pm
15366
seems as good a way as any to establish the popular view. Luxor...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
1:04 pm
15367
What a great idea. Let a Merkit whose only knowledge of chariots derives from buying suspicious looking hot dogs from an Egyptian help decide how the things...
tsubodaibogatyr
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
1:44 pm
15368
HC enjoy a wider bonus when fighting HI organized deep one on one. If the HC are fighting two units, flanked, or attacked in the rear, they do not count as...
tsubodaibogatyr
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
1:58 pm
15369
Can any one explain why,it is that if a catafract is brought in the Marian army the heavy CR is reduced to H5? Is this historically correct? chin...
chinstrap03
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
2:30 pm
15370
Well they slipped this one in quietly. WB get no protection against cavalry when deployed in depth. It would be interesting to hear the logic behind this...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
2:54 pm
15371
Don't HI units in depth receive 3 BP instead of breaking? A WB only gets 3 BP so who cares if it dies by impetous or by receiving 3 BP. Dead be dead. Chris...
chriscos18
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
3:00 pm
15372
I care, because as far as I could see, with the exception of the Dacians, all other WB armies able to deploy their core in depth, have a BP of 4, such as the...
borodino2002
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
3:13 pm
15373
Good point, I was focused on the Dacians. Don't underestimate the advantage of having WB deep and getting twice as many chances to inflict damage. And, as a...
chriscos18
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
3:51 pm
15374
... That's not what the Merkit said. He said: "Note that HI, but not WB, now enjoy the benefits of depth as a counter to impetus if organized in an echelon...
graham_d_evans
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
3:51 pm
15375
Silly scenario involving Dacians. A Dacian WB (breakpoint 3) with a genral attached can form indepth and not be broken by impetus? Chris Coz ... against...
chriscos18
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
4:01 pm
15376
Hmmm! upset am I. Jumping to conclusions eh? perhaps you can explain this line from the new rules 7:9:3 HEAVY INFANTRY IN DEPTH (Counter to impetus) From...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
4:33 pm
15377
Oh yes it can. By forming up deep it becomes MORE vulnerable. Luxor ... a ... <graham.d.evans@n...>...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
4:34 pm
15378
... Not having a set of A2, you have me at a disadvantage. I was relying upon my memory (I'm sure deep WB was in Rob's list of things included) and what the ...
Graham Evans
graham_d_evans
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
5:07 pm
15379
May I suggest to try the new rules, see what it happens and share rather than abstract discussions. So far we did Germans vs. Marian Romans, Patzinak vs....
Daniele Varelli
varelli64
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
5:20 pm
15380
Take a moment or so and consider the armies covered by the Marian army that actually had Armenian allies. Crassus. Mark Anthony. Were those armies as...
tsubodaibogatyr
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
5:33 pm
15381
This has to be a mistake, but if not, it does mean you can move 9" instead of 6" so there is some compensation. You have an FV5 WB that moves like greased...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
5:51 pm
15382
What the merkit actually wrote... Well i looked back at the Merkits mail and he said, " Note that HI, but not WB, now enjoy the benefits of depth as a counter...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
6:02 pm
15383
This was such a powerful list that it was banned from some conventions. This is the answer to that problem I suspect. Historically (sorry Neil) it might be...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
6:08 pm
15384
As the Ostrogoth chief involved in this battle, I strongly deny ever having such a loss. Our men fought valiantly and proved the superiority of "barbarians"...
thresher95210
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
7:59 pm
15385
TThe Romans were hard to beat because they never knew when they were defeated. Roman history was structured around great defeats, and their subsequent recovery...
sfp55@...
steveatglobpro
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
8:39 pm
15386
Yes, but the quote doesn't exclude WBs getting protection if formed deep, only if you try to echelon. Which isn't as bad as you said. ... From: "Peter...
Graham Evans
graham_d_evans
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
9:03 pm
15387
This was such a powerful list that it was banned from some conventions. This is the answer to that problem I suspect. Historically (sorry Neil) it might be...
Peter Morrison
luxor180
Offline Send Email
Apr 1, 2004
9:20 pm
Messages 15358 - 15387 of 32772   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help