Thanks guys for the comments/feedback: I found them all very interesting. Certainly there are more things to keep track of as the dimensions go up, but I...
Simply awesome! Well, without building a new mountain (please Remi don't mention MC6D ;)), it seems the largest (human-climbable) peak has been summited! I'm...
I had hoped to hear some discussion about Melinda's parity question. I have never really understood the parity thing as much as I would like, but that won't...
Yeah, interesting reading for me too. I was swayed by some of the ideas, but I think I'm sticking with my first thought when I heard the question posed, which...
Wow, Noel. I can (and do, wholeheartedly) congratulate you of course, but since you only just scaled the 4*4*4*4*4 peak, it seems all the superlatives are used...
Hello, I solved the 3x3x3x3 a few days ago and after turning in my log file Melinda asked me to introduce myself here. My name is Oscar Lazo, and I live in...
I never got macros to work either. I never figured them out and found it easier to do the moves by hand. ... I never got macros to work either. I never figured...
Hi Oscar, Please feel free to use the solution guide for blogging a translation, or however you see fit. It was nice to hear the Rubiks wiki page brought you...
This is by no means meant to torture anybody, but the underlying code already supported it, so I exposed the 6^5 and 7^5 puzzles via the puzzle menu. I'm not...
Just a question for developers of MC4D and MC5D. I've been expanding the spanish wikipedia article on rubiks cube, and now it also mentions and links to the...
Melinda will be able to answer better, but when I first made the MagicCube5D page, I remember she told me a subtle distinction that is important is to call the...
Roice is correct but I don't think it matters in Oscar's case because while you and I are creating and distributing puzzles which someone could argue might be...
Give us 6x6x6x6 (6^4) :-))))) Signed by: Remigiusz Durka, Micha³ Wizner, Konrad Przetacznik Give us 6x6x6x6 (6^4) :-))))) Signed by: Remigiusz Durka, Micha³...
Wow, those pictures are truly frightening! The funny thing is that after staring at them for a few minutes, when I returned to the MC5D page I found that the...
Yes, please reuse those images if you like! I remember Remi talking about doing a Polish solution at one point as well. I wonder if he ever published anything?...
... From: Roice Nelson To: 4D_Cubing@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 11:22 PM Subject: Re: [MC4D] Wikipedia Yes, please reuse those images if...
Hey guys, I'm avoiding doing my taxes and so I've had some interesting investigations into MC4D checkerboard patterns I thought I'd share :) I was curious...
heh, I should have known to do that. I promise I am trainable. It just takes a long time. (Sarah can vouch that both of those statements are true ... ...
Thank you, well I thought there could have been a catch, and I didn't want to cause you any trouble. By now I'll make the wikipedia article as you say, but...
I'm sorry for the post I summited to the 4D_cubing group. I sent the message to everyone in my address book and didn't realize it had gone out to this group...
Hello Janelle, Thanks for your apology. It's no big deal, we all post too broadly at one time or another. Congratulations on solving the 4^4. Solutions...
Hello, everyone! My name is David Smith, and I hope to be a contributive member to this unique and highly interesting group. My interests besides the cube are ...
Hi David, Very nice to make your acquaintance, and welcome! I'm sure others will have more to say, but I thought I'd point you to two resources on the...
Roice, Thank you very much for your reply! I really appreciate the two resources you kindly pointed out to me. I have actually already read the paper "The...
Hi David, The computer program sounds like a cool project :) After reading this last post, I thought I would also point you to Don's solving code page just in...
