Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
18xx · Railway Board Games based on 1829, 1830
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 21444 - 21473 of 22232   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
21444
This came up again in a game I was playing and players thought a merged company could have a stock price of 3/298 or 4/284. Any idea when rules revision 2.02...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
2:41 pm
21445
chris, this rule has not changed in either version, even though other people may claim that it has. the resulting merged value is either: 1: the highest value...
allen
astancius
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
3:49 pm
21446
Allen, As Steve Thomas acknowledged, the rules *as written in v2.01, the version that I am playing* are wrong. I do not care, and will never care, what the...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
3:59 pm
21447
Chris, I admire your determination to play by a set of rules you do not understand. Sort of a metaphor for life. Bruce ________________________________ From:...
Beard, Bruce D.
beardbruce77
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
4:18 pm
21448
Bruce, I didn't know you were a closet philosopher! What makes you think the rules are not understandable...? (The life ones, not the game ones....) Mike In...
BrophyM
brophmc
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
4:25 pm
21449
Sorry -- that reply was only supposed to go to Bruce, not the group... Mike In a message dated 05/01/08 12:25:56 Eastern Daylight Time, BrophyM writes: Bruce, ...
BrophyM
brophmc
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
4:40 pm
21450
Thanks, I think. I'm pretty sure I do understand the rules. I'm just trying to achieve clarity. I'd much prefer to play by a single set of rules, whether I...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
4:45 pm
21451
... I don't know the answer to Chris' question--that's within John Tamplin's purview. But the above formulation isn't right, in at least two respects. If ...
Maisnestce@...
maisnestce
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
5:03 pm
21452
... I thought life went: 1. You can't win. 2. You can't even break even. 3. You can't quit. Which actually sounds quite a lot like my attempts at playing 18xx...
Tim Franklin
timfranklinuk
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
5:06 pm
21453
Experience. ________________________________ From: 18xx@yahoogroups.com on behalf of BrophyM Sent: Thu 5/1/2008 12:24 PM To: 18xx@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re:...
Beard, Bruce D.
beardbruce77
Offline Send Email
May 1, 2008
5:17 pm
21454
While we're on the subject, I also have an 1841 (v. 2.01) question. Consider the merger of two major corporations, A and B, with two different presidents, Alex...
James Romano
james_c_romano
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
3:59 am
21455
Having been involved in several efforts at revising or clarifying rules in 18xx games, I am aware just how difficult it is to write rules that are so clear...
Lou Jerkich
jerkich
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
4:39 am
21456
it's during the exchange of each pair of shares, starting with the president of the active corporation that the new director is determined, then single shares...
allen
astancius
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
8:17 am
21457
i totally agree here. ... From: "Lou Jerkich" <gamecorner@...>...
allen
astancius
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
8:45 am
21458
Thanks Allen. Jim...
James Romano
james_c_romano
Offline Send Email
May 2, 2008
11:46 am
21459
We would like to get together a game of 18xx or two at the coming game day. I am open to anything but am limited by which games I own. On the other hand bring...
Joe Miller
swsparkscreator
Offline Send Email
May 5, 2008
1:20 am
21460
I'm still liking the religion analogy. Chris is struggling for understanding. Jehovah (played by Allen) appears in a blaze of glory and offers total...
Beard, Bruce D.
beardbruce77
Offline Send Email
May 5, 2008
12:09 pm
21461
Is my understanding correct? 5+5 trains in 1861 can skip both small stations and cities. conversely, 2+2 trains can skip small stations only thanks...
alessandro
ale_greenskid
Offline Send Email
May 7, 2008
9:26 pm
21462
Yes, the 5+5E is an express and can skip any city. The 2+2 is not an express and can only skip dots. Hence the "E". ________________________________ From:...
Beard, Bruce D.
beardbruce77
Offline Send Email
May 7, 2008
11:11 pm
21463
At the start of phase 6, a minor company owns a private company and a 3 train which rusts. The RSR will nationalize both the minor company and the private...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
2:13 pm
21464
I think A is logical, because the player would have the money as a factor in his choice of whether or not to go Gov. The payouts happen first, then the...
Beard, Bruce D.
beardbruce77
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
2:47 pm
21465
Well, the player really doesn't have any choices here. The minor company's only train is rusting, so the RSR will nationalize it no matter what. Chris On Sun,...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
2:49 pm
21466
Oops. I was thinking of major companies. I am not used to minors lasting that long. I would argue that the payment of privates is part of the RSR formation...
Beard, Bruce D.
beardbruce77
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
2:58 pm
21467
The RSR formed back in phase 4. At phase 6, the T3s rust and the RSR nationalizes private companies. I've seen minors last until the first T8 is bought. If...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
3:19 pm
21468
the minor company goes away first, as it's nationalized 'immediately' according to the rules, then the remaining privates are reimbursed by the government to...
allen
astancius
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
3:26 pm
21469
I don't see the word "immediately" applied to the case of minor companies having their only train rusted. Do you have a rules section reference? Chris ... -- ...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
3:29 pm
21470
the order is "quite specific" in the section that explains nationalization. ... From: "Chris Shaffer" <chris.shaffer@...> To: <18xx@yahoogroups.com> ...
allen
astancius
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
3:48 pm
21471
There are several sections that explain nationalization. I do not see anyplace in the rules that has a "quite specific" order. Could you **please** provide a...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
3:54 pm
21472
Section 6.8.4 Nationalization says: ********** At the start of phases 4 and 6, once obsolete trains have been removed, all minor companies that do not have a...
Chris Shaffer
chris_shaffer
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
4:27 pm
21473
that's not the point. the first action to take place is THE REMOVAL of obsolete trains, in which causes the NATIONALIZATION that happens FIRST before any...
allen
astancius
Offline Send Email
May 11, 2008
5:23 pm
Messages 21444 - 21473 of 22232   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help