Hello Fred, at least I will come. I hope that somebody will join me. Michael Noch allein? 1 Million Singles warten auf ein Date! Schnell Kontakt aufnehmen bei...
... The mailing list predates Yahoo's hosting of it by a lengthy period. It may even predate Yahoo. I concur that renaming the list, to something that ...
... Mark has already answered for 18AL: if a corporation has a route, it must own a train, but not if it doesn't. This applies regardless of any history of ...
... From: Maisnestce@... Sent: Oct 1, 2005 6:15 AM To: 18xx@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [18xx] Question about 18xx/PC moderator - trainless corporation ...
... From: 18xx@yahoogroups.com [mailto:18xx@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Ian Kelly Sent: 01 October 2005 04:17 To: 18xx@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [18xx]...
... Yes, but it has a train and thus meets the requirements of having one. It will still run for $0 revenue and fall back until it gets a non-H train or ...
Agreed. Works the other way too: if some clown buys up all your nice pool stock and deprives you of company income, you can pull the same gag on him. ... From:...
... You've still some way to go before simplifying 18xx to its bare essentials. For example, 18AK eliminates everything but money and private companies, and ...
... 1834 has been gathering dust for a while now, perhaps 8 years. Tom had intended to work on it while at CastleCon. Unfortunately, well-intentioned but ...
... Yes, but if SP isn't connected to Chicago, it isn't forced to buy a train, so it's not in the "forced to buy a train you can't use" category. If I were...
... The only ability I can recall similar to this outside of 1856 is the ability of a company in receivership that has no train to borrow one in 1829 and 1853....
Hi Lisa and Steve. I'm still up, pondering the mysteries of the universe, or at least of a hypothetical railroad industry in France and Belgium. Here's how...
My apologies to the group. At this late hour I sent an update on a PBEM game in progress to the wrong address. Sorry. (For those who followed the discussion...
... 1837SX has a nationalised railway which acts in many respects like the CGR in 1856. In particular, if it has no train and has never owned a permanent one ...
Salutations, gentlefolk, Well, since the kiddies are 'out of earshot', methot I'd pass these on to this group. In the ( good old ? )days when 1829 came with...
You are right and the value did move left twice. I just didn't mention the first shift left to D75 from its starting point at D82. Typically I just mention...
... And here we are, thinking of persuading Yahoo! that this group has no adult content... I agree with the voices that say we should stand up for 18xx as a ...
In 18C2C, when someone buys the first 6-train, trainless corporations merge to form Amtrack. But what about merger corporations? The rules (v1.2.9) say: "Any...
I am certain, from talking with Mark and from playing, that "no trains on EITHER shell" is intended to mean no trains at all. If a merger corporation has any...
... companies, and ... solvable, ... Hello Steve. What the hell is 18AK about? I didn't read about this one previously! ;-) ;-) AK = ??? Who is designing it?...
... I've mentioned 18AK on this list before. AK is Alaska. Alaska, in real life, has no passenger railways, just a few mining tracks. The design is easy: ...
... Sure -- shipping would cost more than the components, even in the US :) It also has the benefit that once the auction is done you can plug who bought which...
In which case a clearer phrasing would be "no trains in BOTH (or ALL or ANY) shells". "Either" implies a choice. To my first read, seems to mean if any shell...
No offense, but I doubt you will find any grammarian that will support your view, Dave. "No [object]...either" is equivalent to "[object]...neither": 1. I have...
