Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
18xx · Railway Board Games based on 1829, 1830

Group Information

  • Members: 1494
  • Category: Board Games
  • Founded: Mar 2, 1999
  • Language: English
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Visit the Groups blog for the latest Yahoo! Groups information

Home

 

Activity within 7 days:

7 New Members - 116 New Messages - 1 New File

Description

Discussions about Railway Board Games based on 1829, 1830 and successors.

The 1800s group is for discussing news and play relating to railroad board games based on the concepts of the 1829 and 1830 games originally designed by Francis Tresham.

These multiplayer games entail a simulation of railroad corporation growth and stock market manipulations, while building a railroad
network using a hex track tiles on a specific geography.

The title of the games often relates to a key year that railroad development was started in that region, most of which occured during the 1800's.

There have been a number of games professionally published, and many more fan designs.

For more information on 1800s games themselves see (please exchange 00 with double x):
http://www.diogenes.sacramento.ca.us/1800_net/index.htm
http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Arena/5276/depot/default.htm
http://www.1800.de/index.html

Most Recent Messages

  (View All)
(Group by Topic)
Advanced
   Start Topic
Re: Clarification on route junctions
... In general, I agree with JC Lawrence and prefer track with curves such as #23. However, at the scale of a game such as 18US, the curved type of track loses
Posted - Wed Dec 9, 2009 3:40 am
Lou Jerkich
jerkich
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Clarification on route junctions
http://www.18xx.net/tiles/023.gif This lacks the connection from the north to northeast exits. http://www.18xx.net/tiles/082A.gif This tile does allow that
Posted - Wed Dec 9, 2009 1:56 am
Justin Rebelo
jar0157
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Clarification on route junctions
I have been following this discussion, but have exited more confused than when I began. Am I correct in the following: #1 - There is no question that tiles 82
Posted - Wed Dec 9, 2009 1:47 am
crambaza
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Clarification on route junctions
... The Lawson tiles can't accurately represent a #23 (for instance), just a more generous super-set. Being of meager Christmas spirit and a generally
Posted - Wed Dec 9, 2009 1:28 am
JC Lawrence
clearclaw
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Re: Clarification on route junctions
In message <20091208233839.7B0E440808C@...>, Tim Franklin <tim@...> writes ... But "learning" a representation takes less than a minute
Posted - Tue Dec 8, 2009 11:52 pm
Nick Wedd
nick@...
Send Email Send Email
Add 18xx to your personalized My Yahoo! page Add to My Yahoo! XML What's This?

Message History

Group Email Addresses


Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help